Thursday, July 19, 2012

The Electoral College Map (7/19/12)

Another day, another set of polls in states that are either toss ups favoring Obama or Obama leans. I've got a few things that I want to say about the collection, but you'll forgive me if I press pause on the elaboration and hold until tomorrow. I had some family issues that called me away, but I wanted to get these polls in and a graphics update up.

The quick take away is that nothing changed on the map, Electoral College Spectrum or Watch List despite a tied poll in Virginia and two new surveys from Nevada.

New State Polls (7/19/12)
State
Poll
Date
Margin of Error
Sample
Obama
Romney
Undecided
Poll Margin
FHQ Margin
Nevada
7/16-7/17
+/- 3.8%
665 registered voters
50
46
4
+4
+5.40
Nevada
7/17-7/18
+/- 2.95%
1092 likely voters
49
43
6
+6
--
Ohio
7/18
+/- 4.5%
500 likely voters
47
45
4
+2
+3.79
Virginia
7/10-7/16
+/- 2.4%
1673 registered voters
44
44
10
0
+3.01
Wisconsin
7/17-7/18
+/- 2.93%
1162 likely voters
49
42
9
+7
+6.22








The Electoral College Spectrum1
RI-4
(7)2
MN-10
(156)
NH-4
(257)
IN-11
(159)
ND-3
(55)
NY-29
(36)
NJ-14
(170)
OH-183
(275/281)
MT-3
(148)
MS-6
(52)
HI-4
(40)
CT-7
(177)
CO-9
(284/263)
GA-16
(145)
AL-9
(46)
VT-3
(43)
WA-12
(189)
VA-13
(297/254)
WV-5
(129)
KY-8
(37)
MD-10
(53)
NM-5
(194)
IA-6
(303/241)
SC-9
(124)
KS-6
(29)
CA-55
(108)
OR-7
(201)
FL-29
(332/235)
LA-8
(115)
AK-3
(23)
MA-11
(119)
PA-20
(221)
NC-15
(206)
NE-5
(107)
OK-7
(20)
IL-20
(139)
WI-10
(231)
MO-10
(191)
AR-6
(102)
ID-4
(13)
DE-3
(142)
NV-6
(237)
AZ-11
(181)
TX-38
(96)
WY-3
(9)
ME-4
(146)
MI-16
(253)
TN-11
(170)
SD-3
(58)
UT-6
(6)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Romney won all the states up to and including Ohio (all Obama's toss up states plus Ohio), he would have 272 electoral votes. Romney's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Obama's number is on the left and Romney's is on the right in italics.

3 Ohio
 is the state where Obama crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line.



The Watch List1
State
Switch
Florida
from Toss Up Obama
to Toss Up Romney
Georgia
from Strong Romney
to Lean Romney
Michigan
from Toss Up Obama
to Lean Obama
Missouri
from Toss Up Romney
to Lean Romney
Nevada
from Lean Obama
to Toss Up Obama
New Hampshire
from Toss Up Obama
to Lean Obama
New Mexico
from Strong Obama
to Lean Obama
North Carolina
from Toss Up Romney
to Toss Up Obama
West Virginia
from Strong Romney
to Lean Romney
1 Weighted Average within a fraction of a point of changing categories.


Are you following FHQ on TwitterGoogle+ and Facebook? Click on the links to join in.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

The Electoral College Map (7/18/12)

There were a handful of polls out today and and additional one that came in after the buzzer yesterday. How earth-shattering any of them were is in the eye of the beholder, but each of the four were from states that were and continue to be blue following the addition of the new polls to the FHQ weighted average.

New State Polls (7/18/12)
State
Poll
Date
Margin of Error
Sample
Obama
Romney
Undecided
Poll Margin
FHQ Margin
New Hampshire
7/5-7/15
+/- 4.5%
470 likely voters
49
45
3
+4
+4.66
New Jersey
7/9-7/15
+/- 2.4%
1623 registered voters
49
38
11
+11
+13.95
New Mexico
PPP1
7/13-7/16
+/- 3.64%
724 registered voters
42
38
6
+4
+10.88
Virginia
7/16-7/17
+/- 4.5%
500 likely voters
47
46
3
+1
+3.23
1 The poll numbers used from the Public Policy Polling survey of New Mexico include Libertarian candidate, Gary Johnson. The former New Mexico governor received the support of 13% of the respondents. Without Johnson, Obama (49%) leads Romney (44%) by 5%. Using that data would have increased the FHQ weighted average margin to 11.14 in favor of the president.

Poll Quick Hits:
New Hampshire:
I don't know that I buy the idea that Obama slipped in the UNH Granite State Poll. Sure the margin was small-ish, but the result was entirely in line with the recent New Hampshire polling. The problem, if you can call it that, was that most seemed to compare this July Granite State Poll to the one conducted  April. And yeah, that poll represented something of a high water mark for Obama. It is, along with the January UNH poll and a May Public Policy Polling survey, the among the minority of polls to show Obama cresting above 50%. Is New Hampshire close? Yes. Have other polls shown this already? Yes as evidenced by the minuscule drop in the FHQ margin between the president and Governor Romney once this poll was added. Moving on.

New Jersey:
Strong Obama state before, Strong Obama state after. That there was any significant shift in the weighted average was driven more by the fact that the Quinnipiac poll replaced the +23 Rutgers poll as the most recent poll of the presidential race in the Garden state. That did jump New Jersey up two spots toward the victory line on the Electoral College Spectrum. Don't read too much into that at this point though. There just isn't enough polling data on the state level yet to prevent some minor volatility like that.

New Mexico:
The Public Policy Polling survey in the Land of Enchantment doesn't really pass the smell test. I don't say that because there is anything wrong in the poll necessarily, but more because this one looks like an outlier at this point. As CNN's Peter Hamby tweeted, New Mexico isn't on either campaigns' radar. I also liked Dave Weigel's comment that Crossroads has been running ads in New Mexico unchecked, but I'm not ready to sign off on that rather convenient explanation until I see either Obama or Romney campaigning/buying ad time there or some more data showing this tight of a race.

Virginia:
If you want a tight race, see Virginia. Of course, the Rasmussen poll represents the closest margin in a survey of the Old Dominion since the deadlocked poll Rasmussen released a month ago. The net change in the overall weighted average in Virginia as negligible. It remains the fourth closest state behind North Carolina, Florida and Iowa.


All told, the four polls did not change anything on the electoral college map. In fact, the only thing that did change on the map was the date.

The Electoral College Spectrum1
RI-4
(7)2
MN-10
(156)
NH-4
(257)
IN-11
(159)
ND-3
(55)
NY-29
(36)
NJ-14
(170)
OH-183
(275/281)
MT-3
(148)
MS-6
(52)
HI-4
(40)
CT-7
(177)
CO-9
(284/263)
GA-16
(145)
AL-9
(46)
VT-3
(43)
WA-12
(189)
VA-13
(297/254)
WV-5
(129)
KY-8
(37)
MD-10
(53)
NM-5
(194)
IA-6
(303/241)
SC-9
(124)
KS-6
(29)
CA-55
(108)
OR-7
(201)
FL-29
(332/235)
LA-8
(115)
AK-3
(23)
MA-11
(119)
PA-20
(221)
NC-15
(206)
NE-5
(107)
OK-7
(20)
IL-20
(139)
WI-10
(231)
MO-10
(191)
AR-6
(102)
ID-4
(13)
DE-3
(142)
NV-6
(237)
AZ-11
(181)
TX-38
(96)
WY-3
(9)
ME-4
(146)
MI-16
(253)
TN-11
(170)
SD-3
(58)
UT-6
(6)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Romney won all the states up to and including Ohio (all Obama's toss up states plus Ohio), he would have 272 electoral votes. Romney's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Obama's number is on the left and Romney's is on the right in italics.

3 Ohio
 is the state where Obama crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line.

The Watch List added only New Mexico. The PPP survey pulled the Land of Enchantment within range of shifting to an Obama lean. That does bring a little of the darkest blue onto the list, but that is really the only noteworthy thing about it. There is still a fairly wide berth between New Mexico and Oregon, the Obama lean state with the largest margin.

The Watch List1
State
Switch
Florida
from Toss Up Obama
to Toss Up Romney
Georgia
from Strong Romney
to Lean Romney
Michigan
from Toss Up Obama
to Lean Obama
Missouri
from Toss Up Romney
to Lean Romney
Nevada
from Lean Obama
to Toss Up Obama
New Hampshire
from Toss Up Obama
to Lean Obama
New Mexico
from Strong Obama
to Lean Obama
North Carolina
from Toss Up Romney
to Toss Up Obama
West Virginia
from Strong Romney
to Lean Romney
1 Weighted Average within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

One thing that I failed to mention in the initial trial electoral college post yesterday was that the map (and perhaps the other graphics -- I haven't decided yet.) will have a permanent home here. You can also find a link to that by clicking on the map in the upper left corner.



Are you following FHQ on TwitterGoogle+ and Facebook? Click on the links to join in.

FHQ Credentialed for Both Major Party Conventions

Word on credentials decisions seemingly [finally1] trickled out via email from the Democratic National Convention Committee to the blogger class yesterday. FHQ was among the lucky ones to nab credentials to the Charlotte convention, meaning we'll be on the ground at both conventions later this summer.

Big news. I'm excited to see (and share) what happens at both conventions in terms of the 2016 rules.

...among a great deal of other things.

--
1 The RNC notified me of FHQ's credentials to the Tampa convention at the end of June.



Are you following FHQ on TwitterGoogle+ and Facebook? Click on the links to join in.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

The Electoral College Map (7/17/12)

With just 16 weeks left for candidates to win -- 112 news cycles to spin -- before election day, here is what the electoral college map looks like using FHQ's graduated weighted average.



Now, FHQ will not focus too extensively on the electoral vote numbers. The intent at this juncture to create the baseline from which future updates can and will be compared. The electoral vote tally is secondary -- at least for now -- to the graphic below. The Electoral College Spectrum translates the weighted averages (more on those in a moment) into a ranking of states from the most strongly-aligned with Barack Obama to the state most firmly behind Mitt Romney. Of course, for our purposes, all the interest is not in those easy to peg states so much as the states that will decide the election within the electoral college. In 2008, Obama pushed toward the bottom of the middle column of states and was competitive into the next rightward column (states like Georgia and Arizona).

But in 2012 the terrain is different. The battle is still being waged overly closely competitive states in the middle column of the Electoral College Spectrum, but instead of a push to the right, the overall tilt is back toward the left -- bluer or traditionally bluer territory on the presidential level. Michigan, for instance, is much closer in the FHQ weighted average than it was in 2008. And that brings this discussion back to the utility of the spectrum: It gives us a glimpse into the relative arrangement of states in terms of the margins separating President Obama and Governor Romney in a weighted average of state-level polls. The common refrain from political scientists is that this process is like a pendulum swinging back and forth from cycle to cycle; that states will, overall, see a similar shift in the aggregate. But the underlying assumption is often that while the partisanship of the electorate may shift which state falls into which party's column in any given election, the alignment of states is largely similar. That is certainly not wrong. A glance back at 2008 shows that Rhode Island and Hawaii are every bit as much Obama states as Utah and Wyoming are Romney/Republican states. The same is true for the group of states that will see so many candidate visits and never-ending television ad buys over the next 16 weeks.

However, the relative ordering is important and so are some of the individual state shifts. Take aforementioned Michigan. The Great Lakes state is now essentially right where it was in the ordering in FHQ's final electoral college projection on election day 2008. But it is a lot closer in 2012. Iowa, on the other hand, is also closer in 2012 relative to 2008, but it has shifted over an entire column on the spectrum. That is significant in all of this.1 It also adds a layer to our understanding of the shifts or prompts at the very least to ask why one state has moved so much and another has not.

[For more on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum, please follow the link in the figure's footnotes.]

The Electoral College Spectrum1 
RI-4
(7)2
ME-4
(160)
NH-4
(257)
IN-11
(159)
ND-3
(55)
NY-29
(36)
MN-10
(170)
OH-183
(275/281)
MT-3
(148)
MS-6
(52)
HI-4
(40)
NM-5
(175)
CO-9
(284/263)
GA-16
(145)
AL-9
(46)
VT-3
(43)
CT-7
(182)
VA-13
(297/254)
WV-5
(129)
KY-8
(37)
MD-10
(53)
WA-12
(194)
IA-6
(303/241)
SC-9
(124)
KS-6
(29)
CA-55
(108)
OR-7
(201)
FL-29
(332/235)
LA-8
(115)
AK-3
(23)
MA-11
(119)
PA-20
(221)
NC-15
(206)
NE-5
(107)
OK-7
(20)
IL-20
(139)
WI-10
(231)
MO-10
(191)
AR-6
(102)
ID-4
(13)
DE-3
(142)
NV-6
(237)
AZ-11
(181)
TX-38
(96)
WY-3
(9)
NJ-14
(156)
MI-16
(253)
TN-11
(170)
SD-3
(58)
UT-6
(6)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Romney won all the states up to and including Ohio (all Obama's toss up states plus Ohio), he would have 272 electoral votes. Romney's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Obama's number is on the left and Romney's is on the right in italics.


3 Ohio
 is the state where Obama crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election. That line is referred to as the victory line.

Finally, one additional figure helps to parse this out further: the Watch List. These are states that are a fraction of a percentage point in the weighted average from shifting categories. Florida, for example, is within one point of shifting into Mitt Romney's column. If one is looking for new polls that might have an effect on which states fall into which category (strong, lean or toss up), these are the states to be on the look out for.

The Watch List1
State
Switch
Florida
from Toss Up Obama
to Toss Up Romney
Georgia
from Strong Romney
to Lean Romney
Michigan
from Toss Up Obama
to Lean Obama
Missouri
from Toss Up Romney
to Lean Romney
Nevada
from Lean Obama
to Toss Up Obama
New Hampshire
from Toss Up Obama
to Lean Obama
North Carolina
from Toss Up Romney
to Toss Up Obama
West Virginia
from Strong Romney
to Lean Romney
1 Weighted Average within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

Methodology (quick hits)2:

  • Everything above is based on a graduated weighted average of polls in each state conducted in 2012. The weighting is based on how old a poll is. The older the poll is the more it is discounted. The most recent poll is given full weight. The main difference between what one sees here and what FHQ did toward the tail end of the 2008 cycle is that the collective weight of the polls other than the most recent one are not halved. The reason for the change is based on where we are in the process, or more accurately, how many polls have been conducted. Right now, there just are not enough polls in each state and the full weighted average is needed to ward off the influence of outliers that may arise. Later on, say, post-conventions most likely, we may have enough polls serving as a sufficient anchor on any outliers. There can be a fine line between the responsiveness of the averages and wild fluctuations. The way things are constructed, the average ends up being fairly conservative. If a change occurs, then, it is usually a lasting change.  
  • Strong states are those states with an average margin between Romney and Obama of over 10%. Lean states are those between 5% and 10% margins. Finally, toss ups are those states under 5%. Admittedly, these distinctions are somewhat arbitrary. There is enough space between New Hampshire and Michigan and the other Obama toss ups that those two states could be moved into the lean category. The same is true -- probably truer -- of Missouri on the Romney side of the ledger. There is a wide berth between Missouri and North Carolina. The 10% does appear to be a pretty good cutoff between lean and strong states though. One other addendum is that these cutoffs will be adjusted downward as we approach election day. If memory serves, the toss up threshold was moved to under 4% sometime between the conventions and the first debate and to under 3% after the final debate. Those moves are made under the assumption that greater distances are more difficult to make up for a candidate the closer it gets to election day.
  • It should be noted that there are still a host of states where no polls have been conducted. For those states and for those states with just one poll, the averages of the final margins from the 2000, 2004 and 2008 elections were used. Those three elections were averaged with the lone poll in the states with just one poll conducted thus far. FHQ is not totally comfortable with this (see particularly Arkansas and West Virginia), but it is the best that can be done in this simple framework. There is plenty of complex out there, but we like to keep it simple here if only to stack up a rather parsimonious model against some of the other more complex ones at the end of the process. 
  • Updates? If polling is trickling in at least somewhat regularly I will try to update every day even though that level of posting isn't really necessary at this point. Look, I've to make amends for starting this in July somehow. 

Comments, questions, things I missed? Please feel free to chime in on Twitter (@FHQ, hashtag #ec2012) or in the comments section below.

--
1 Of course, there are some issues with that comparison. First of all, the comparison points in the race and thus the amount of polling data available in July versus November is vastly different to say the least. Why, just this morning, FHQ was bemoaning the lack of polling in Iowa of all places. For a state as seemingly close as it is, it has been polled very sporadically in 2012. Secondly, one could also take issue with FHQ using its weighted average instead of the actual election results where Iowa was much closer to its current position. That is a fair point. Both datapoints are useful. Plus, that points out a potential shortcoming of the polls and the resulting weighted average (with more emphasis on the latter).

2 For a more extensive look at the methods behind the above figures please feel free to check out the FAQ from 2008. The underlying methodology is largely similar.


Recent Posts:



Are you following FHQ on TwitterGoogle+ and Facebook? Click on the links to join in.